Family Office Software Comparison
Asora vs Masttro
Enterprise depth without the enterprise timeline. Live in weeks, not quarters.
Masttro is an enterprise wealth intelligence platform. See how Asora delivers comparable capabilities with faster implementation and more accessible pricing.
By Adam Cleland · Facts verified 4 August 2026
TL;DR
Asora offers comprehensive data aggregation and data quality (cleansing and enrichment), an intuitive user interface, and flexible pricing for both single and multi-family offices. It also includes workflows that support day-to-day operations and reduce manual effort. Masttro provides comprehensive reporting with mobile access and a subscription model that is not tied to AUM. The verdict for lean family offices: if you want reporting and operations in one system, live in 4-6 weeks on published pricing, Asora is the stronger choice. Masttro fits offices with a dedicated operations team and room for a 12-14 week implementation.
Overview
Choosing the right family office software is crucial for modern family offices managing complex portfolios across multiple asset classes. The best platforms give wealth owners real-time insight, streamline operations, and reduce manual work and human error — and with so many options available, deciding between them can feel impossible for both single family offices and multi family offices.
Masttro is a well-established wealth intelligence platform serving ultra-high-net-worth families and large multi-family offices with comprehensive data aggregation, reporting, and analytics.
Asora delivers comparable capabilities with faster implementation and transparent, published pricing. Clients typically go live in 4-6 weeks, compared with the 12-14 week onboarding Masttro states for new clients.
One note on 'complexity', a word that features heavily in enterprise sales conversations: lean does not mean simple. Asora clients run multi-entity structures and significant alternatives exposure. What a lean office skips is not sophistication; it is the overhead of an enterprise rollout.
This comparison covers pricing models, reporting and analytics, wealth mapping, task management, deal tracking, and implementation, to help family wealth managers, wealth advisors, and individual wealth owners choose the platform that best serves their needs.
Asora vs Masttro: Head to Head
A side-by-side look at how each platform handles core family office capabilities.
Pricing Models
Transparent tier-based pricing starting at €800/month ($900/month), tiered by the net worth under management. Every tier includes the full platform and unlimited users, with optional add-ons for additional investment accounts and automated alternatives data ingestion. All pricing is published on the Asora pricing page.
Fixed subscription that is not based on AUM — a model that suits teams wanting predictable fees regardless of portfolio size. Pricing is not published; contact the vendor for a quote.
Performance Reporting & Analytics
Tailored, on-demand reporting that wealth owners can download in PDF or Word format. Performance analytics with customisable functions, time frames, multi-currency options, and detailed asset-level performance over any period, including cash flow forecasting.
Reports for managing various data types using AI technology for fund reports, serving the reporting needs of advisors and wealth professionals, with performance dashboards and interactive charts.
Wealth Map & Ownership Visualisation
Includes a look-through feature that extends views to show assets at both the account and entity level, with seamless reporting integration and intuitive UI.
Provides ownership visualisation tools that display family and entity hierarchies with the ability to view underlying holdings.
Task Management & Operations
Comprehensive task board to assign responsibilities, monitor progress, and streamline operations across team members managing client assets.
Task management is built into the platform: assign tasks, set priorities, and track progress, with tasks tied to vaults, assets, and users.
Investment Tracking & Deal Management
Pipeline tracking for assets under review, keeping the whole team's information consistent when evaluating private equity, hedge funds, and other investments alongside capital calls and operational milestones.
Supports portfolio monitoring and data management for alternative assets. Public information does not specify whether a dedicated deal pipeline feature is included.
Implementation & Onboarding
Clients typically go live within 4-6 weeks with a dedicated onboarding team that handles data migration, entity mapping, and user training. Against a 12-14 week rollout, that is your first consolidated report roughly two months sooner.
Masttro states that onboarding typically takes 12-14 weeks depending on the scope of the client's data and entity structure, with a dedicated implementation specialist and project manager, and ongoing support included after go-live.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Asora if you want reporting and operations in one system, published pricing you can budget against, unlimited users, and a go-live measured in weeks. Multi-entity structures and significant alternatives are exactly what it is built for, without the overhead of an enterprise rollout.
Choose Masttro if you have a dedicated operations team, want AI document extraction built into an enterprise platform, and can plan around a 12-14 week implementation with pricing on request.
Feature Comparison
A detailed feature-by-feature comparison of Asora and Masttro.
Data Management
| Feature | Asora | Masttro |
|---|---|---|
| Automated bank feeds | ||
| Multi-custodian aggregation | ||
| Data cleansing & standardisation | ||
| Alternative investment data | ||
| Multi-entity structures |
Reporting & Analytics
| Feature | Asora | Masttro |
|---|---|---|
| On-demand reporting | ||
| Customisable dashboards | ||
| Performance attribution | ||
| Wealth map with look-through | Limited | |
| AI document extraction | Via Canoe integration |
Implementation
| Feature | Asora | Masttro |
|---|---|---|
| Time to go live | 4-6 weeks | 12-14 weeks (vendor-stated) |
| Dedicated onboarding | ||
| Unlimited users | Varies | |
| Transparent pricing |
Security
| Feature | Asora | Masttro |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 certified | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
| Private cloud option | ||
| Two-factor authentication |
This comparison is based on publicly available information as of August 2026 and is provided for informational purposes only. Features, pricing, and capabilities are subject to change. We recommend verifying current details directly with each vendor. All third-party product names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Asora is not affiliated with or endorsed by any third-party vendor referenced herein.
Who is Asora best for?
Lean family offices, principals, and embedded CFOs who want enterprise-grade reporting and operations without hiring an implementation team or waiting a quarter to go live.
Pricing
Masttro uses a fixed subscription model not tied to AUM; pricing is available on request. Asora pricing is published: tiered by net worth under management from €800/month ($900/month), with all features and unlimited users in every tier.
See Asora pricing“We have spent a fraction of the time we spent before organising and aggregating reports and performing calculations as the software has been a big part of our back office.”
60%
Less time on data gathering
10 min
To create reports
≤4 weeks
To go live
Frequently Asked Questions
How does pricing compare between Masttro and Asora in 2026?
Asora publishes its complete price list: nine tiers from $900/month (portfolios under $30M) to $3,300/month ($750M-1B), every tier with all features and unlimited users. Masttro uses a fixed subscription that does not scale with AUM, with pricing available on request only. If budget certainty matters in procurement, Asora is the only one of the two you can price without a sales call.
Does Asora handle alternative investments natively?
Yes. Private asset tracking is a native Asora module covering commitments, capital calls, distributions, and valuations across private equity, real estate, and direct investments. The optional Canoe integration adds automated extraction of data from fund documents; it is an automation add-on, not the basis of Asora's alternatives coverage.
Which family office software is better for single family offices vs multi family offices?
Asora's tier-based pricing and unlimited user model makes it suitable for both single family offices and multi family offices of any size. Masttro also serves family offices and larger organisations, and the right fit often depends on the size, complexity, and operating structure of your office.
How do Asora and Masttro compare on data aggregation capabilities?
Asora connects directly to private banks, custodians, and asset managers, and can support any institution that provides a data feed, helping offices automate data collection across holdings. Masttro also offers aggregation capabilities, and implementation may vary depending on the systems and providers your office works with.
Can I transfer my data from Masttro to Asora?
Yes, you can transfer your data from Masttro to Asora. Our onboarding team will work closely with you to ensure a smooth data migration process, including the mapping and transfer of your existing data sets, entities, and ownership structures. This helps you maintain historical records and continuity as you transition to Asora.
Which platform is better optimised for operations?
While both Masttro and Asora offer task management for operations, Asora is specifically optimised for operational workflows in single-family offices and UHNW environments by offering additional features like pipeline tracking. This allows your team to not only manage daily tasks but also track investment deal flows, capital calls, and operational milestones — all within one platform.
What should I consider when comparing implementation and onboarding?
Compare how each provider handles data feeds, setup complexity, and ongoing support. Asora clients typically go live within 4-6 weeks with hands-on migration of entities, ownership data, and historical records. Masttro states that its onboarding typically takes 12-14 weeks depending on the scope of data and entity structure.
Other Comparisons
Explore how Asora compares to other family office software platforms.
Asora vs Aleta
Reporting tools report. Asora runs the office.
View ComparisonAsora vs Vyzer
Purpose-built for family offices, not upgraded from a personal tracker.
View ComparisonAsora vs Excel
Spreadsheets report the past. Asora runs the office.
View ComparisonAsora vs Landytech
Built for the family office team, not the institutional middle office.
View ComparisonAsora vs Copia
The whole office in one system, not just the alternatives book.
View ComparisonReady to switch from Masttro?
Book a personalised demo to see how Asora can modernise your family office operations.